Bad News For Museveni As Court Expose Military's Rejection Of Martha Karua Despite Legal Certificate

Bad News For Museveni As Court Exposes Military's Rejection Of Martha Karua Despite Legal Certificate.

The General Court Martial's decision to reject Kenyan lawyer Martha Karua has exposed significant flaws in Uganda's military justice system, creating a setback for President Museveni's claims of judicial independence.

According to military prosecutor Col. Raphael Mugisha, the court's controversial stance limited representation to only AF Mpanga Advocates, despite Karua's valid legal credentials. This restriction affected over 30 other qualified lawyers attempting to defend Dr. Kizza Besigye.

Court Martial Chairperson Brigadier Robert Freeman Mugabe's insistence on written instructions contradicted standard legal practices, raising concerns about military court procedures. The decision particularly highlighted inconsistencies in handling international legal representatives.

The defense team, led by Kampala Lord Mayor Erias Lukwago, revealed systemic barriers at the courthouse. Security forces implemented restrictive measures, preventing legitimate lawyers from accessing their clients.

Military authorities maintained their position despite Karua's newly acquired practicing certificate, exposing gaps between civilian and military legal protocols. The situation worsened with defense attorney Eron Kiiza's detention.

The controversial handling of legal representation coincides with pending decisions about the court's jurisdiction over civilian trials. This development has drawn attention to broader concerns about military courts trying civilian cases.

AF Mpanga Advocates' request for consultation time underscored the growing tension between military procedures and civilian legal rights. Judge Advocate Brigadier Tukacungurwa's stance on certification requirements further revealed procedural inconsistencies within the system.